Stephen Hawking's book "Big Design" Criticism

We submitted a review of Stephen Hawking's comments and co-author Leonard Mlodinow. from

Big designfrom

. The author cites the views of physics and metaphysics. However, superior physics does not guarantee metaphysical expertise. Only syllogism from the only real source can determine the correctness and error of the monograph.

Trying to criticize from

Big designfrom

The author must admit that it is not just a random interest in the "essence of things." In my own little wisdom, in the present history, there is a reasonable starting point for important assumptions: regardless of their size and power. In addition to a reasonable debate, scientists claim to be "from scratch." they said:"...The law of gravity and quantum theory allow the universe to emerge spontaneously from nothing... The universe we know is just one of the billions of countless universes.".

Here, Hawking and Mlodinow opine Universe began to create through physical spontaneity or super intelligence. They accept physical observations and theoretical contributions from experience or experimentation; they recognize the infinity of special and general relativity and quantum mechanics; however, they ignore the experience and experimentation of considering established theism. Of course, they believe that religion lacks mathematical precision; they mistakenly succumb to the inaccuracies in the speculative consensus of their own multiverse and equation theory. Ben Winter even questioned the ubiquitous application of E = mc2. It does not effectively specify more energy than the energy contained in the ultimate particle mass.

Their debate about the existence of God also follows the logic: Emmanuel Kant said: "No one has the wisdom to deny the God of another personIn the absence of insight, this reasoning must be considered truth to assess the inherent guilt of another person. This winter will add observation: "Anyone can create a god at any time without having to verify it."

We commented on other comments from the Christian Chronicle; Dr. Rubel Shelly, longtime minister, author and president of Rochester College in Michigan, was also criticized from

Big design from

 And made the following observations:"If there has never been anything for a while, then nothing exists now. Since something is clearly already there, you can make a more intuitive, more reasonable, more empirical choice... creative God or quantum mechanics?"

Respectfully, we want to know if the Ph.D.'s good definition of "forever" comes from the traditional misunderstanding of the Bible's semantics. In either case, Dr. Shelly is also wrong. Because, the word is defined in the biblical reference frame as "until the set time."

Very challenging everyone's opinion of everything! from

Big design from

 It is a good way to renew ideas in physics and metaphysics; however, in summary, the book is more devoted to speculation than to substance, and leaves a huge gap between the causes of the universe and the causes of modern religion. These problems were solved in another study.

---

Orignal From: Stephen Hawking's book "Big Design" Criticism