Esther's book tells of the close relationship between parents and stepchildren. I don't like the etymology of the word "step". It comes from "steop" which means being deprived or lost. Modern psychology likes to say that "the step-parent is born from the loss", the idea and feeling of the ladder relationship has brought negative meaning to the already chaotic and complicated family dynamics. Because in today's culture, the losses caused by these ladder relationships are usually caused by divorce and remarriage, it is assumed that "real" parents still exist and may cause problems. It does not look as good as it is and beyond the will of God. Under one roof, a man, a woman is tied in a holy marriage, and it is ideal to raise the children they give birth. This is undeniable, this is the will of God. But will these ideal situations automatically achieve the ideal relationship in God's will? I do not think so.
Some people think that the word "step" describes how new parents suddenly "step into" the child's life and the biological parents. This connotation does not improve the outlook. That's why I like the word "Foster" instead of the steps. The etymology of the word is closer to what it means to be a father of a non-living child. Foster means training, support, feeding, and training. But in this culture, this means that the acting parents will get the state's remuneration to raise the child so that the wind can be blown away. The quasi-evil purple dinosaur Barney said: "A family is a person, a family is a love", but this is completely oversimplified, and does not define anything, especially the important role of everyone in the family has a relevant title.
It seems that the only way to resolve any of your father's prefixes is to use them legally, but before you know it, you are back to the "adopted" parents. People's perceptions of these situations are always problematic. They are very interested and curious about the circumstances they are considering. Has this child been orphaned because of death, being abandoned, losing parental rights? I don't even get into the agent, it's an agent who creates a more familiar plot. Unfortunately, for a person who is as important as his father, there is no qualified title. If the responsibilities and obligations of this role are properly undertaken and transported, there is little obvious difference. Therefore, whenever I am called by my son's biological father's surname, I know that I have to correct this person and then explain that "John is not the fruit of my waist, but I love him." Then, I smiled at the reaction they corrected in this strange language, and at the same time told us what the relationship was - without a proper title to describe it.
It is about the same for me and John as Mordechai and her future daughter, Esther. Mordecai went into the life of his orphaned little cousin and used Esther as his daughter when his mother and father died. It is as simple as that. He accepted her and trained and encouraged her. He sought his own interest and found an opportunity for her to make Esther a queen. He did this very frankly. It was later proved that through Esther's common love and affection for her future father, she would risk her life to save him and the rest of the people. This story tells how she intervened to prove to the king that her future father is not his enemies trying to make him his rude rebel, not only eager for his execution, but also to reverse the situation in his enemies and make Mordecai a In the high place of the kingdom. For centuries, people have always remembered their dedication to God, their courage, and their loyalty to each other and to other Jews. This relationship, resulting from loss, is protected and wonderfully blessed.
Orignal From: Parenting - Mordicai and Esther
No comments:
Post a Comment