Sunday, April 21, 2019

The difference between creativity and innovation

I think creativity is really thinking about new concepts/things. Innovation is making this new concept/thing practical in a novel way. Creativity is dreaming of a new invention, and innovation is making it a reality in a unique way. When you bring something new, you can say that you created it. You can't say that you have innovated it. Once again, when you improve something that already exists, you can't say that you created it, but you can say that you innovated it.

Henry Ford created an assembly line for automotive production. The Japanese perfected this concept by introducing their own unique innovations/changes/improvements. Many people are very creative, but their innovation is not enough to make their work practical. Innovation makes creativity practical and efficient. Most inventors have failed because they are not innovative enough. Most painters are very creative, but when they introduce innovation in creation/art, they become artists. Without creativity, there is no product/concept that needs to be implemented. If you think of something new, you need innovation. Research and development is about innovation. Sometimes innovation can make creation unrealistic, so this new idea may be abandoned, and innovation may bring new ideas, and innovation may bring creativity. Innovation provides a new direction for existing ideas.

There is confusion and ambiguity between creativity and innovation, because innovation is actually a new way of creating existing/creative concepts. So they all have creativity. Innovation also involves creativity.

All PhD programs are designed to innovate ways to make old materials in a better and more efficient way. Innovation is about solving existing problems. At the defect level, innovation is research. At research institutions, they are creating better, better innovations for existing solutions. A person does not need a Ph.D. to gain creativity, but for cutting-edge innovation, a Ph.D. is almost an essential requirement. In fact, at the university level, innovation is better than creativity. Controversy about any newly created ideas until they can be scientifically defined, measured and tested, involving complex and time-consuming investigations, not to mention finance. However, anything that is already in use and has proven its usefulness, then any improvement through innovation is fully accepted. My own invention, 'Vacuum Generator' is based on a sound principle, "Nature Absence Vacuum"#; however, due to another reasonable principle and the law of conservation of energy, it is the highest in the US government. The layer is restored. The law of conservation of energy shows that the energy you invest will decrease due to friction. But in essence, there are exceptions to this law! Hydraulic, fulcrum power will consume more energy. Vacuum power is the fulcrum of wind power generation. But this is an unproven and overly radical idea, and it also requires a lot of money to make prototypes. On the other hand, I have a small improvement in the baby bottle that I can sell immediately.

Creativity is critical to innovation because products must exist at least in the concept phase because you can't innovate anything that doesn't exist. Therefore, innovation depends on creativity, while creativity does not depend on innovation. Although the success of creativity depends on innovation.

Creativity = Invention and Innovation = Improvement = Change makes it effective and efficient = Make it practical = New ways of researching production and improving creativity = Behaviors that produce the same concept in new and improved forms.




Orignal From: The difference between creativity and innovation

No comments:

Post a Comment