The effectiveness of the tool has been proven around the world, but it has some limitations: it should not be used to assess the more dynamic tasks that need to be evaluated for leg and hip postures. The tool's author, Dr. Lynn McAtamney, produced a different tool for this purpose - Rapid Systemic Assessment [REBA]. It also does not include important factors in relation to time or relationship with other tasks.
Since office work is currently sedentary, RULA is the ideal tool for use in this environment, and the development of an online version of the tool significantly increases the speed and application of the tool. The assessor no longer needs to refer to multiple sets of tables to get the score. This increases the accuracy and the amount of completion on a reasonable time scale, thus further reducing the cost of the company involved in this step in the risk management plan. By attributing to the set of RULA scores for tasks, workstations, equipment and individuals, companies can reduce risk in a targeted manner, as gestures or actions to avoid, adjust or reduce can be clearly identified.
However, in order to achieve this result, the assessor must overcome a difficult aspect of using RULA, which is the posture that the evaluator requires to evaluate. Some people take the most important or highest scores and may just use RULA to prove a point when trying to implement the changes they think they need. Of course, the opposite may also be true, and more of it is cynical, it may be used to support the efficiency of the proposed or deployed change. So how can we determine what the RULA score or score set shows us? The answer, of course, is that it will depend on the evaluator, or more or less, depending on the reporting tools used to present and interpret these scores. One sentence is reminiscent of a certain degree of workers and their relationship with tools to support a culture of accusation!
As an ergonomics consultant for more than 12 years, I have experienced enough unpredictable workplace attitudes and personal reactions to them, knowing that firm and quick deterministic assertions are almost always broken. When applying scores to a situation, it is easy to suggest, and in fact is often a reliable measure and is supported by the undeniable truth of mathematics.
This may cause difficulties for the person making the assessment and the person receiving the summary of the results. 'Science' The level of action posted with this tool has somewhat softened delivery. These can get accurate scores and turn them into terms that manage comfort, and can accept 'may be ' and soon will ' and slightly more amazing 'immediately & #39;! This makes the tool more influential
It can achieve a realistic level and ensure that there must be a certain degree of interpretation and application in the company's risk management system. The first three action levels also referred to further investigations as part of the assessment. As everyone knows, those who pay for the assessment will have some confusion - after all, if the evaluator has been doing nothing? What does the tool generate in addition to confirming what needs to be done? If any management team has invested time and money to complete the RULA assessment, will they be accused of not knowing what they need?
Paradoxically, you need to answer this question before asking a question. For individuals similar to RULA, the evaluator and management must clearly state "fast"; RULA only focuses on the upper limbs; RULA is a 'tool' and the result is a filter based on the posture loading priority changes Device. The clue is in the name and should be clarified if it is to be advertised as part of the assessment.
Ergonomics has many applications in the workplace, and ergonomics are often misunderstood when describing the scope of their profession or expertise. It is very important that we do not confuse our customers or customers with the tools we will use when conducting ergonomic evaluations. Instead, we should assure them that our qualifications and experience mean that we can use a comprehensive set of tools to conduct comprehensive and detailed investigations, provide solutions to most problems in the workplace, and provide solutions for long-term solutions to the remaining problems.
In summary, the RULA assessment is a very useful tool for ergonomics, with a rigorous toolbox.
Orignal From: What is a RULA assessment? - An ergonomician's answer
No comments:
Post a Comment