Many people who attended school not long ago remember that as a student with special needs, they meant to go to school on a separate bus to attend classes with other children with different disabilities. These courses are more like day care than schools. Even the most advanced students do not want to get a high school diploma, let alone go to college. Since then, the term disabled and special needs students has expanded to more people than IQs below any arbitrary standard. What I tried in the first article was to give some history of the evolution of the Education for People with Disabilities Act.
In 1954, the US Supreme Court ruled that Brown v. Board of Education, 347 US 483 [1954], found that segregated schools violated the right to equal protection. Applying this concept to children with disabilities, especially learning disabilities, will take another twenty years to try to get an education. In fact, shortly after Brown was identified, the Illinois Supreme Court found that compulsory education did not apply to students with intellectual disabilities, and it was not until 1969 that it was a crime if the child had recruited a disabled child in a public school. Excluded
Things began to change as a result of court challenges in Pennsylvania and the District of Columbia in the early 1970s. In 1975, Congress enacted the 1975 Education for All Persons with Disabilities. This is the first law that requires all students with disabilities to have the right to education. It not only requires all students with disabilities to have the right to education, but also forces local educational institutions not to do so. Shortly thereafter, the term disabled was replaced by "children with disabilities". Although revised in 1990 as the Education for Persons with Disabilities [IDEA], the most comprehensive change occurred in 1997. The Act requires schools to identify children with disabilities to ensure that all children have access to "free appropriate public education and related service design". Meet their unique needs and prepare for employment and independent living. 20USC § 1401[d]. Unfortunately, recent changes in 2004 have made the law more difficult to obtain the benefits it deserves, depending on the next The composition of the government and Congress may or may not be the trend that will be taken in the future.
What exactly is "free and appropriate public education"? According to the law, it is defined as "special education and related services, [A] public fees under public supervision and guidance, and no charge: [B] meets the standards of national educational institutions; [C] includes appropriate in the countries involved Pre-school education, primary or secondary education; and [D] personalized education programs as required by [legal]. "In other words, schools must provide services that meet their needs. Children with disabilities may affect their ability to learn. These "related services" can be services provided in the classroom, such as giving children extra time to complete the test. They can also include services that can be provided outside the classroom, such as counseling, or for children to attend a day or accommodation program outside of school, as well as transportation.
For historical data, I rely on Wrightslaw: Peter WD Wright and Pamela Darr Wright's special education law and the special education law for continuing legal education in Massachusetts, Massachusetts.
Orignal From: Special Education Law - Overview
No comments:
Post a Comment