Tuesday, May 7, 2019

Sir William Prague’s criticism: the nature of the atom

Nobel laureate physicist Sir William Prague developed the law of diffraction. Through this formula, scientists can measure the diameter of an atom. This measure is so small that it is incomprehensible, but X-rays diffracted from the surface of a crystal atom can be measured with more than controversial consistency; therefore, we can know the size of any atom, in a hundredth of a centimeter [10- Incremental measurement of 8 cm], expressed as one angstrom.

Prague describes a universe that is completely controlled by atoms, including gaseous and complex states, and: a combination occurs, and when the condition is met, something in the atom itself contains it. The entire chemical process focuses on the nature of these conditions and their consequences; however, the atoms are never completely static; at the very least, they vibrate and tremble at the average position, just as the iron bridge vibrates as part of the iron bridge's vibration.

Sir William reduced the complexity of science to the most commonly used language; in fact, this book is an introductory book on physical science; however, it contains important information that most people are not familiar with. His papers do not require the reader's scientific background, even when studying the complexity, dimensions, energy stimuli, and attractiveness of specific atoms—especially the tendency of molecules to grow into more complex aggregates in predictable ways.

First, as an ancient alchemist, now studying science and advanced biochemistry, humans strive to use atoms to achieve his own norms and special needs. Hydrocarbon fuels are a good example; here, in the world of atomic bonding, crude oil can be refined into ethylene, hexahydrobenzene, naphthalene, etc. simply by adding or removing carbon-hydrogen attachments. Therefore, we can understand how the simplest molecule [bond between two or more atoms] is converted into a more complex form in the presence of light, temperature and pressure.

Your critics would suggest the existence of atomic intellectuals, and the molecules tend to attract their interests; there is no doubt that each human cell [through atomic covalent and molecular interactions] communicates with its neighbors to achieve mutual survival. And program its own cellular presence independently of the contribution of perceptual cognition. However, this observation goes beyond Prague's intention; because he solves the laboratory procedure to determine the quality and quantity of different elements to determine the basic properties of the element - don't ignore the tendency of the atom to seek beneficial integration with other atoms. He continued: "Their importance lies in their combination. You can compare atoms with the letters of the alphabet. These letters can be combined into a myriad of ways to form words. So atoms can be formed in the same diversity combination. It is a molecular thing. '

By measuring the radioactivity of different elements, Sir William assumed that the atoms were very small and needed to be measured in the range of 1/100 million cm. To further clarify the small size of the atom, the electron size is about 1 / 10,000 of the nucleus. If the reader has some interest in the nature of things, then this book is recommended for beginners and scholars as the main introduction to the physical sciences; here, interested people can study the most atomic atoms in gases, liquids, crystals and metals. Basic nature.

As human beings, we are just a bunch of atomic compounds; our body cells and matrices contain intelligence that can spread our own existence; of course, with the intellectual support of atomic interaction, we are curious about the wisdom of independently working to maintain a composite intellectual.




Orignal From: Sir William Prague's criticism: the nature of the atom

No comments:

Post a Comment