Wednesday, May 8, 2019

Corporal punishment - low self-control and low self-esteem

Murray Strauss, a professor at the University of New Hampshire, found that children who spanked or experienced other corporal punishment were more at risk of sexual activity by adolescents and adults who verbally or physically interfere with their partners.

Straus analyzed an international dating violence study of more than 14,000 college students from 68 universities in 32 countries. Students were asked if they were spanked or often hit before the age of 12 and whether they had dealt with a sexual partner in the past 12 months. Strauss said: "If the child's happiness is threatened, parents should not spank."

The study showed that men who performed corporal punishment were four times more likely to have sexual intercourse with a person who did not undergo corporal punishment. Forcing includes controlling someone or catching them. Women who have been corporal punishment are also more likely to force sexual partners to have sex, rather than those who have not played ass.

Strauss published the results of the study at the American Psychological Association Summit. He said: "People concluded that using coercion, physical coercion is ok.

Strauss said the study is consistent with other studies that show that corporal punishment leads to low self-control and low self-esteem, as well as aggressive, antisocial personality and violent behavior that may lead to an understanding of sexual coercion. He emphasized that there are other ways to train children who work better and have no side effects.

Alice Miller, the most famous psychiatrist, has the same career as Strass in the form of child abuse, including physical abuse, emotional abuse and child sexual abuse. Miller researched and wrote about the impact of toxic education on children and adulthood thinking, and the resulting impact on society as a whole.

Twenty-one states allow corporal punishment in schools. In the 2004-2005 school year, 272,028 students in the United States were subjected to corporal punishment. This is a significant drop of nearly 10%, and has continued to stabilize since the early 1980s. This statistic does not include corporal punishment at home.

The states that allow corporal punishment are: Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, Mississippi, North Carolina, New Mexico, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania [some school districts are banned for corporal punishment], Tennessee, Texas, Wyoming.

Studies of 8,000 American households have been shown [Straus, MA and Yodanis, CL, 1994]. 78% of the paddling countries achieved a fourth-grade level below the national average in reading. In the eighth grade readings, 75% of the paddles reached below the national average [Effective Discipline Center, 2004]. In the 99-00 school year, 67% of Ohio rowing schools ranked the lowest 25% of state school transcripts [Effective Discipline Center, 2001].

Miller, with the help of her research, books, articles, interviews and readers' answers, showed that sending emails on her website, like childbearing and humiliation, not only produces unhappy and confused children, but not only Destructive teenagers and abusive parents, and this is also a chaotic, irrational society.

Miller believes that the root cause of global violence is that children are defeated all over the world, especially in the first few years of their brain structure. The damage caused by this practice is devastating, but unfortunately these points are rarely linked by society. The facts are easy to understand: children are hidden to protect them from violence against them. Their only way is to pass natural reactions such as anger and fear deep into their hearts, and they fight against themselves in adulthood. These strong emotions are released. Children or the entire country. Miller showed this dynamic in her book, not only using her case history, but also using her extensive research on dictators and famous artist biographies. Avoiding this problem in all societies she knows suggests that extremely unreasonable behavior, barbaric acts, sadism and other perversions can be completely undisturbed in the family [they regain the right to "train" their children, and the products can It is considered "gene regulation." Alice Miller believes that only by understanding this dynamic can we break the chain of violence and she will devoted her life to this enlightenment.

Alice Miller proposed a concept of treatment, which shows that we need to face our own history and recognize and thus reduce the fear of being unconscious but highly active in the previous internal beatings of children. When we succeed in feeling our righteousness, anger and indignation instead of condemning it, we can become independent and free to choose our way of life - free from religious rhetoric or family traditions. . Because it is this childhood fear of abusive parents that causes adults to abuse their children and live in serious illnesses, rather than taking the cruelty that they have endured. Numerous esoteric and "religious" proposals help to cover up the suffering caused by torture, but are completely denied.

Miller believes that although its tragic aspect of discovery actually contains a very optimistic choice, because it opens the door to consciousness, raising the awareness of childhood reality, thus lifting its destructive consequences. She understands that her pursuit of childhood reality is a strong opposition to psychoanalysis, which, in her view, is still an old tradition of accusing children and protecting their parents. For this reason, Miller gave up her membership in the International Psychoanalytic Association in 1988.

Alice Miller's work reveals:

o Poor children, ethnic minorities, children with disabilities and boys are hit harder in schools, sometimes 2-5 times more often than other children.

o Academic achievement is a risk factor for the use of corporal punishment of children.

o The number of school shooting deaths found in countries that allow school corporal punishment is significantly higher than those who do not have school corporal punishment.

o There has been no increase in school violence due to a decline in the use of paddles. Since 1994, the rate of violent crime in schools has fallen dramatically. The rate of serious violent crimes in 2003 [6 out of 1,000 students] was less than half that in 1994.

o There is ample evidence that severe interventions can cause emotional and physical harm to children. The impact of this trauma can be more complicated when the child has pre-existing learning difficulties. When schools use harsh methods to address these challenges, children may be further traumatized.

o School corporal punishment is more widely used in the south and southwest as well as in rural areas rather than in cities and suburbs.

o corporal punishment is abolished in more than 100 countries in the world, but the United States does not

o Children in corporal punishment schools believe that violence is an acceptable way to solve problems. Studies have shown that this message is taught to those who cause pain, those who accept pain, and those who witness.

o Reduced internalization of corporal punishment and moral rules for children, increased aggression, increased antisocial behavior, increased crime rates, decreased mental health, increased adult abuse and increased risk of victimization of adulthood.

o Corporal punishment strengthens physical assault as an acceptable and effective means of eliminating social misconduct.




Orignal From: Corporal punishment - low self-control and low self-esteem

No comments:

Post a Comment