For many people in the 21st century, the Bible seems to be out of date, but as the best-selling person in history, it still acknowledges many new comments. There is no doubt that Karen Armstrong is one of the most qualified to join this huge literary work. Her extensive knowledge is impressive. After outlining how the sixty-six books were assembled, she turned to how the texts were interpreted by schools of different ages. In the process she often reminded us of the annotations, a Greek meaning for guidance or guidance. .
Karen Armstrong explained that in the centuries before any word was written, the wisdom of the past was passed down from generation to generation. Story narrators have been granted licenses to modify and modify their stories. This license extends to a new generation of new authors, many anonymous or claimed to be well-known past prophets who redesigned and rearranged early text. ' From the beginning, the authors of the Bible were free to modify the texts they inherited and gave them completely different meanings. ' A lot has been added, some things have been lost, but in the end it is still trying to establish an official canon, a set of books approved by religious authorities.
Two classics were discussed. The Old Testament books were originally composed of several languages, including Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek. Jews and Christians were shared, but the New Testament books were originally written in Greek, only Christ. Use it. Karen Armstrong described how Jews and Christians have been interpreting for many years. Everyone seeks new insights from ancient texts, believing that the patchwork of ancient papers can preserve the hidden words of God.
Exegesis has worked hard in a variety of ways. Many schools have dedicated their lives. The school has been working for generations and has detailed analysis of each book, chapter and verse. Most efforts involve transcending meanings to emphasize meaning. Others gain new insights by linking words and phrases in different books, which are often distant from each other in time and background. Only one system was condemned. The Bible lacks historical accuracy and contains many contradictions, and any attempt to understand it literally can quickly lead to confusion. Karen Armstrong expressed sympathy for most religious groups fighting this literary giant, but she warned that the interpretation of the text caused the danger of fundamentalism.
Orignal From: Book Review: The Bible: Biography, by Karen Armstrong
No comments:
Post a Comment