Currently in the United States, any public grant study must be open to the public. This means data, as well as any documents written by the main investigator. This is a good rule and a good rule. There are some exceptions, but they are very rare. Academic institutions or leading researchers can no longer sell their research papers through these third-party academic article companies. Nonetheless, universities and university research centers funded by endowment funds or foundations can usually receive these research findings and papers, or simply hide them as intellectual property.
Still, if it's a public university, I think I still have problems because the main investigator is on the agency's payroll, and the agency is partially publicly funded. This debate has been going on for some time, and when someone unlocks the study and sends it to the world, it often appears in the news. Interestingly, Russians, Chinese and others often monitor these universities and university research centers, so they already have the information, but our own innovators, entrepreneurs, scientists and companies do not. Consider this while I continue this conversation.
"New York Times" [Sunday commentary] recently published an interesting article entitled; "all research papers should free it?" Author: Kate Murphy, published March 12, 2016, the lock question of research papers And charge a huge fee for journal articles.
Many years ago, the MIT system was disrupted, and all research papers that were usually sold were posted online for everyone to see. Some people praise this "moral hack" while others see it as theft. Whether this is the behavior of Robin Hood in the modern electronic age, it is difficult to say afterwards that all new laws require publicly funded research to be free for citizens [not involving national security]. Despite this, the Electronic Freedom Foundation is pleased to report that the unlocking of research papers is more fair than ever, even if they admit that there is still work to be done and that the situation needs to be monitored.
If universities hold locked-in data and our taxpayers pay the same fees to other universities, then when we already know, we waste money on research duplication - how it helps our country, drive progress or push technology to the future. You decide.
Orignal From: Why are research papers locked and not made public?
No comments:
Post a Comment