This is known as the "explosive" follow-up of the devil's economics, "and the subtitles are: global cooling, patriotic prostitutes and why suicide bombers should buy life insurance.
Almost no whole world can get enough teams, they constantly question our assumptions about how the world works, and how we should assess the media bombing our statistics.
According to the statistics [if you accept that they assume people are drunk while driving], they open up something that is not intuitive and obvious. For drunken people, drunk driving is safer than them. Was drunk.
It's safer for other drivers who are drunk, but it's safer for drunken people – so they won't lie in the middle of the street and faint outside, fall in front of the car, cross the road without looking, or Other dangerous things that drunken pedestrians do. They don't even include the real potential of being robbed [in some neighborhoods].
Finally, a study of how scientists teach monkeys to measure coins - they even found prostitution.
In the process, they carefully studied the economics of [human] prostitutes and compared the situation many years ago and today.
More potentially controversial is the chapter on global warming, which highlights a company led by former Microsoft employees who lead other geniuses to find cost-effective ways to make money by solving world problems.
These scientists seem to think that the world is particularly warm, but they clearly realize that the current models are not complicated enough, but that they are placed outside the frenzied environmental camp.
The author talks about how current environmental movements look like a religion that tries to limit carbon dioxide, not just ways to reduce global warming, but deliberately destroy civilization as we know it. They mentioned this and seemed to be aware of the threat, but don't delve into the motives of fanatical environmentalists or explore their true goals.
Instead, they aim to "reduce global warming" and then let scientists discuss how to do it at low cost.
As a person who does not pretend to be a climate scientist, I am an agnostic of global warming.
However, as a "solution" to the so-called global warming threat, as a threat to human freedom and economic development, I hope that they will further expose radical environmentalists using climate change as a means.
They even reopened the notorious Kitty Genovese case, although apparently did not read Robert Cialdini's explanation, the neighbors who witnessed the attack or murder thought that others had called the police. They found that someone did call the police, and the police apparently reacted slowly because no one knew the severity of her injury.
I personally like this use fact to expose the form of myth. God knows that we need more facts and backgrounds, fewer media lies and distortions.
Orignal From: Steven B Levitt and Stephen J Dubner's Super Devil Economics
No comments:
Post a Comment