For nearly a decade, politicians seem to bury their heads and consider ways in which the country can improve the health and well-being of our citizens and respond to politics in a bipartisan manner! If some people's reaction is not just to express a message about so-called socialism, etc., wouldn't we get better service? Many Republican opponents believe that the "Affordable Care Act" has spent a lot of time, especially against the law, rather than correcting its flaws. Although the law of course requires, from
Tweak from
It seeks to address the fact that the world's richest country [United States of America] has not reached or even approached best statistics on morbidity, mortality, infant survival and other health-related items, as well as prescription drugs in the world. The most expensive cost. Why are we citizens who are bankrupt, trying to pay for medical expenses? Why do we pay more for prescription drugs than the exact ones paid by others? With this in mind, this article will attempt to review, review, and discuss some of the alternatives we might use to improve our existing approach.
1. The status quo before ACA: Why did the "Affordable Care Act" be passed in the early stages of the Obama administration? What is its intention? Why do you need it? Before the enactment, in this country, health care is often about from
Rich, yes - no from
! More and more health insurance companies seem to be, from
Shaking the dog, from
Not a health professional! Individuals with pre-existing conditions are often denied coverage, rates often accelerating because we are old and every year, quality medical/health insurance becomes more expensive! Millions of people do not have or have very limited insurance coverage, and we often see people being forced to choose between quality care and diet! Those who support this behavior seem to believe that our citizens need, deserve, better care, and quality treatment/care. For many people, they feel that medical/health care should be a right and a guarantee, not just for the richest people!
2. ACA paragraph: When this behavior was passed, it was usually a party line, when the Democrats were the majority party. Although the basic intent of legislation is good faith, due to the nature of our political system, it is somewhat flawed, many consequences and emergencies have not been fully considered, and so on. The cost has not decreased, as promoted, and although they may increase at a slower rate, it still hurts many of us! The Republicans did not improve the details and fix it correctly, but spent time and effort continually trying to repeal it, but did not provide any viable alternatives and/or solutions to address these challenges.
3. Trump's Alternative / Strategy: When Donald Trump was running for president, he expressed a message announcing that he would repair the health care system, which would be better and cheaper. He promised that it would be easy and created a slogan, from
Abolition and replacement, from
It seems that he has a secret recipe! What his supporters did was not to admit the plan, but to be more different, but what is even worse was that he was defeated, he returned to his habits, blamed and complained, and solved it by subway and destroyed it. One of the steps is mandatory coverage, elimination, making each person's insurance more expensive, and the other is reducing/eliminating, subsidizing, for the most needed people, and creating an affordable care alternative system. The consequence of these steps is hurt, not help! Now, Trump's Department of Justice is supporting, taking legal action to declare the act, unconstitutional, rather than realistically considering the potential negative effects, and if they get, what they seek. It looks a lot like a person, he killed his parents and begged for mercy because he was an orphan!
4. Proposed medical insurance - for everyone: Although for some people this looks great, the overall analysis seems too simple! Medicare itself is a flawed system in which taxpayers contribute through their work and life, and after we reach the age of 65, we need more than $1,600 in additional donations each year. In addition, it covers only about 80% of the part. Part B and supplementary insurance cover most of the cost and now cost more than $3,600 per year. Even after these costs, people need additional policies, prescription plans, or extreme out-of-pocket expenses. Another consideration is that doctors are expected to accept these reduced rates of medical insurance because they are entitled to a patient basis. Does it make sense to it? from
Adjustment, from
And improve instead of trying to reinvent the wheel?
Is it quality care, rights or privileges? If, like most Americans [according to many opinion polls], you think this is a right, then ask your elected officials to move on, rather than acting politically as usual!
Orignal From: Health/Medical in the United States: Some Alternatives/Selections
No comments:
Post a Comment