Historic attempts, weakness and selfishness at best, the four knights of the cultural apocalypse have long been committed to establishing their relevance to defending humanity. For the corner of the spiritual iceberg, the return from philosophical thinking to pretentious scientific validity claims. Behold, they come from the darkness of human intentions and demand the truth in the dark mystery of human intentions, motives, and eternal curses. As for experts, politicians, the public, and every career, or missionary or confessional culture missionaries, they cultivated the arrogance of speculation that is considered "scientific."
Among those who do not have strict scientific qualifications like astronomy, biology, chemistry, anatomy and physiology, through rigorous analysis and argumentation, philosophical conjectures together make their creation a creative nightmare creature. In the academic field, the path of small resistance, the trails and sidewalks where the herds frequently travel are crowded with large-scale credulity, and the handcuffs have fascinated many people. For the usual suspects, in the betrayal of mythology, magic, and metaphor, these four people associate their smug devout piety with bad reasoning fallacies. Among them, the arbitrary excuse of magical thinking makes the masses stand out in the simplistic thinking.
In the sacred sanctuary of anecdotes, it is easy to assimilate holiness through historical flashbacks and false claims of research and verification. If the challenge comes from mathematical analysis, biophysics, subatomic microscopy, astronomical forensics, and scientific validity, then the cavalry will find the eternal shortcomings on the outside. Subjective verification replaces the facts. Because criminology, psychology, sociology, and theology counterattack in the form of revenge, their obstacles invade many borders. No one disagreed and broke the formation.
In the pseudo-science adventure, anything is possible, however, just mentioning the word should not cause fear, hostility or belief. Nothing in the term should trigger eviction from the church, exorcism or execution, but encourage the intensity of ongoing investigations. Without silver bullets, holy water or weapons on hand should counterattack those who may question the scientific truth of countless conjectures. By insisting on investigation and review, questioning and suspicion of plausible summaries, the health suspicion of pursuing intellectual vitality is creative and productive.
Still, mentioning anything that might sound like, looks or seems to imply something like "pseudoscience," an emotional reaction turns a seemingly normal individual into a poisonous demonic entity. The problem arises in what is normal, or better what is a "reasonable person." In addition, the issue should also consider the timetable to determine when it is acceptable to raise the level of stupidity or ignorance in terms of pursuing the truth and providing evidence to support any assertions. Negative emotions are disgusting.
As for the historical reference point, in the article of the main online scientific journal, the author thinks about which point in American history, it becomes part of the mainstream of society that accepts fictional facts. In addition, as one of the founding fathers claimed, a fully rational thinking process, supported by scientific verification, and prolonged testing and systematic research to prove or refute, is crucial to revealing the truth. This tip is contained in the work of historical scientific researchers and those who contributed to the Declaration of Independence.
Although people have the right to believe, at least to some extent in the West, knowledge enhances the wisdom of changing civilizations, not just speculation based on opinions, but through in-depth research, rigorous testing and analysis, argumentation and controversy. In addition, the belief system either changes over time or remains stationary until it stagnate. In any case, continuous intrusive assessment within each individual is critical.
In addition, ongoing discipline is critical because they should understand the other based on their point of view, time and place, maturity, experience, innovation, growth and discovery. Because most people at a certain point in time, at least based on predecessors, and they selflessly pay attention to rigorous analysis of their ideas, these ideas lead to the propositional point of view. Disagreements are indicative, while peer review is fraud, there is no laboratory or criminal laboratory, and the microscope proves the assertion at hand through scientifically verified physical properties. Alternative philosophical obsessions are often fixed on unconfirmed fantasy.
Ideology claims are not sufficient without rigorous testing of evidence certification by weight in the physical field. As for those, beliefs, especially those that are mysterious, supernatural or cult, are contaminated by subjectively verified prejudice. The key to the maturity of experienced real-world credibility includes the degree to which transitions choose a higher level of informed enlightenment. Although everyone should strive to transcend an individual's self-intention, most people are reluctant to pay attention to their own interests. Unfortunately, arrogant efforts make pseudoscience a science.
Non-practitioners of various philosophical genres, especially those who move from classroom to classroom, have never been involved in the real world, and the challenge of credible scientific verification remains daunting. Therefore, "field research" is often passed on for anecdotal observations, interviews, surveys and guesswork on other studies. In the previous self-righteous speculative rumors, sometimes the appearance of "science" is related to the investigation. Others will soon begin to accept "scientific verification."
As the public begins to accept ideological views as "comprehensive evidence" of unconfirmed claims, gameplay becomes more common. Although some researchers have tried round-table discussions on issues such as "real science" and "pseudoscience", as well as "peer review" and critical analysis, the experience is not satisfactory. Especially in academia, fantasy sometimes becomes a defensive theory, and the challenge of the pretentious fable of a novel disguised as a fact usually leads to division.
Claiming or otherwise implementing scientific illusions, specific schools of thought or ideology, has little effect on problem solving in the daily affairs of human behavior. Although various doctrines and dogmatic traditions advocate a scientific basis, the reality is that the use of the "scientific methodology" cannot appeal to practicality. Through the revolution of magical thinking, this is a leap from the theory to the confirmation of evidence. Moreover, in the 21st century, reflecting the words of a scientist, people may have given up the ability to distinguish between science and science fiction. Personal prejudice distorts every point of view.
For a tendency to subjective verification, bias into each query. Controlling this tendency through some objective effort is critical to any investigation. Accordingly, this indicates the impact of the investigator's personal beliefs. Attempts have been made to identify preconceived notions and their impact on ideological preferences. Depending on the survey and the organization conducting the survey, the results may vary. In this regard, the study of religious tendencies by a major research institution is related to "belief to God", and it is proposed that very few 80% of participants believe in "higher authority".
That is, majors claim beliefs about sacred beings or supernatural entities that affect their lives. According to reports, in education, the degree of credibility of people with graduate degrees is about 70%. Of course, the temptation here is to speculate on the influence of the belief system and the "scientific methodology" in pseudoscience. Two-thirds of educated people believe in supernatural phenomena, how does this affect objectivity?
The illusion intricately proves many parts of the whole. Obtaining a belief system from the source of the "cult" or dogma, presuming the mixture of errors makes the mythical proportion of the paradox of reasoning to the accepted hasty conclusion more complicated. Colluding with a number of witty claims, there is no evidence that the physical evidence is organic and rigorous, whether micro or cosmic, viewpoints, opinions and gossip flirting will become grotesque forms of imaginative superstition. In most disputes of argumentation and debate, the interaction of interpersonal interactions should be carefully predicted in terms of human behavior in psychoanalysis.
One or more participants may not have reached sufficient maturity.
from
In order to confront or otherwise interact in a more stupid way of production, personalization is necessary to some extent. Prejudice, prejudice, immaturity, lack of experience, lack of close ties with reality, etc., stifle the energy of enlightened freedom. As mentioned earlier, dogmatism and dogmatism limit the far-sighted process. This suggests that intergenerational rifts may occur because the younger generation may not have reached the level of competence that has been reinforced by years of experience, education, and personal transformation. Mature, adult, adult, and smarter insights require special investments that are selfless and differentiated.
An example of young people's indifference to adventure...
Orignal From: Four Knights of Cultural Revelation - Criminology, Psychology, Sociology and Theology
No comments:
Post a Comment