While there are tests that measure creativity or innovation, there are many inherent flaws. Some of the content is as follows:
a] The existence of a creative or innovative type is highly controversial. Creativity can be defined as problem identification and idea generation - universal ability. Creativity can be defined as generating ideas, some different ideas and some novel ideas - universal abilities. Features are unstable or transferable under different conditions. Motivation is a key factor.
b] Because of the many relevant definitions of creativity and innovation, it is clear that many different and different capabilities are involved. All abilities are impossible [or rare] to appear on a single person.
c] Creativity is a cognitive process and case dependence. Not everyone generates the same number of ideas in a task. What is important is that the same person does not produce the same number of ideas in the task.
d] Make too many assumptions. It has been pointed out that creativity and innovation are stable and transferable assumptions in all situations; motivations and abilities are not considered, and so on.
e] Ignore collaboration, networking, etc. Interracial pollination produces a higher degree of creative output than individual individuals.
f] The generality, variability and reliability of the test parameters can be disputed.
These topics are covered in an in-depth MBA paper on managing creativity and innovation and can be purchased from http://www.managing-creativity [including creative and innovative DIY audits, Good Idea Generator software and Power Point demos]. Com.
You can also get regular free newsletters by entering your email address at this site.
You are free to copy this article as long as you don't make any changes and keep the author's name and site URL.
Orignal From: Creativity and innovation management - personality test
No comments:
Post a Comment