Introduction
The Criminal Court is part of the Supreme Court of Justice and deals with the most serious criminal offences. This article will detail some of the important facts about the Royal Court, review its origins and explore the reasons for its introduction. The procedures involved in the criminal court, such as who the judge is and the role of the judge in the trial, will be detailed next. Other areas of consideration will be how to present evidence and judgments that may be imposed on those convicted of guilt. The criminal court is not only a mechanism for dealing with offenders. It is also a place where victims can be closed while managing justice. Therefore, it is important to discuss the procedures involved in the victim. Finally, this article will explore future recommendations for the criminal court and the entire criminal justice system.
origin
The Criminal Court was established under the "Court Act" of 1971, which abolished the invalid system that was in force at the time, which involved many local circuit courts throughout the country. The system is unable to cope with the number of criminal offences. Assizes is a local court that is regularly heard in front of the judges of the Queen's Judges Chamber of the High Court. They travel in seven circuits split between England and Wales, assembling juries and hearing cases in Assize Towns, so a more powerful system needs to be introduced. Despite this, the Assize Court was created by Henry II in the 12th century and was introduced by the jury for the first trial. Although it has little resemblance to today's jury system, it is the first time that the accused's guilt or innocence is not determined by divine intervention, just like a tried trial.
The system was first piloted in Liverpool and Manchester in 1956 and was employed nationwide in 1972. There are ninety royal courts in England and Wales, the most famous of which is London's old Bailey, which is at the top of the Royal Court system. The environment provided by the Royal Court of Justice allows decisions to be made only on the basis of the evidence provided.
Criminal procedure
The time required to hear a case in a criminal court may be between three and six months. However, in some cases it may take longer. It is not uncommon for the accused to meet with the barrister on the first day of the trial. This situation has led some to believe that judicial expediency may sacrifice justice.
Any case sent to the criminal court by the Magistrate's Court will be presided over by the trial judge. The level that the trial judge will hold can be determined by the color of their robes, and more senior judges wear red robes. The judge will supervise the trial from an elevated platform [called a judge] in front of the court and will determine what may or may not be cited. In front of the judge will be his staff, he will face the court's ushers. The receptionist was accused of moving evidence in court and bringing witnesses to court.
The procedure for a judge to enter the court includes a statement of "full rise" by the clerk, followed by everyone in the court until the judge is seated. This practice requires showing respect to the judge in court.
Once the judge sits down, it will start tracking. In all cases, the prosecution will go ahead. This will then allow the judge to assess whether a sufficiently strong case has been submitted for the trial to proceed. It is not uncommon for the defence to provide no submission, as the judge can make a decision that no case can be answered. However, if a case can be answered, the defense will submit its submission to the jury. The defender of the prosecution must undoubtedly prove that the person accused of the crime did commit such crime.
Once the two barristers have submitted all the submissions, the jury will retire to consider the outcome of the judgment, that is, "to tell the truth." They will be required to be convicted or acquitted. The consequences for a defendant who enters a crime of acquittal and is found guilty by a jury may be serious. This is because the judge will review the consequences of the initial defense. E.g:
"If a person is acquitted and found guilty, whether or not he is guilty, the judge will consider the taxpayer's trial costs, and the defendant does not show remorse. It wastes court time. This may lead to more Imprisonment. On the contrary, an innocent person may conclude that even if he did not commit the alleged crimes he accused, the evidence on which he was accused also implied him. Therefore, he may wish to plead guilty and ask the court to consider the above factors, albeit Take a positive attitude.
Although this may sound a bit strange, it is the result of due process and runs through most societies throughout the Western world.
Crime victim
Criminal courts can provide a blockade for victims of crime. In criminal proceedings, the fair maxim that "just has to do, and must be considered completed" is most obvious. The defendant can punish the victim by imprisonment. Although this is never enough for an individual who may lose loved ones in the hands of another citizen, the fact that the victim has received justice is enough to enable people to rebuild their lives. There is also a victim's charter introduced in 1996, although it has been reviewed since the death of Stephen Lawrence in consideration of racist crimes.
Future possibilities
Like most other institutions in the criminal justice system, criminal courts are subject to scrutiny. A review by the Criminal Courts of England and Wales indicated that a new unified criminal court should be established to rename the criminal courts to criminal courts, dealing only with indictable offences and serious two-way crimes. There is also a more radical proposal to replace the current jury system with three judges. However, this later proposal was rejected in some respects. Some people think that the jury trial is the foundation of a democratic society, which may be sacrificed for judicial expediency. However, others suggest that jury members' understanding of complex criminal law rules may lead to misjudgment by either party.
in conclusion
The purpose of this article is to briefly introduce the criminal court. To understand any system, you must first have a certain level of knowledge about the origin of the system. There is evidence that criminal courts can provide comfort to victims of crime, although they involve criminal defendants. However, for anyone, this is also a painful experience, especially for those accused of crime. For the Royal Court and all criminal courts in England and Wales, the future of the future will be uncertain.
Orignal From: Criminal Law: A Critical Analysis of Criminal Courts
No comments:
Post a Comment